Applied Comms AI
@index.appliedcomms.ai.ap.brid.gy
19 documents
0 likes
0 shares
Sep 2025 since
View on Bluesky
One Year of Applied / Comms With AI: What We Learned, What Changed, Where We Are Now

A little over a year ago, I began the Applied / Comms With AI newsletter began with a simple promise: to experiment, fail, learn, and share everything along the way.

Twelve months, two dozen-plus experiments, tool tests and practitioner interviews later – as well as a couple of recent awards wins – it feels like a perfect moment to pause, breathe, and take stock.

My headline would be this: yes,…

Read more →
The Honesty Gap: Ben Verinder on AI, PR and Trust

Ben Verinder has researched AI in public relations for eight years. In this Applied Comms AI Leader Interview, he explains why the policy gap everyone talks about sits on top of a deeper one: an honesty gap between teams, agencies and the people they serve.

Read more →
The Cost of a Miss: Comms With AI in the Govern Phase

Every efficiency gain in the Create phase lands as a workload increase in Govern. More content, produced faster, still has to be checked, approved, and stood behind. This article is about the phase where AI created the problem before it offers any of the solution.

Read more →
AI in Crisis Comms: Help or Hindrance?

"The key is preparation. Use AI now to understand its capabilities and limitations. Build your prompts library when you're calm. Test on low-stakes issues. Because when a real crisis hits, you don't want to be experimenting – you want proven tools and workflows ready to deploy." - Amanda Coleman

The Work Before the Work: Comms With AI in the Strategise Phase

Most AI conversations in communications start with the draft. That framing misses where quality is actually set – in the research, positioning, stakeholder mapping, and message architecture that happens before a single sentence gets written.

The Volume Problem: Comms With AI in the Create Phase

Most AI adoption in communications starts with content creation. The real test is not whether agents can produce more, faster. It is whether agent-assisted work still meets the standard senior communicators would trust in public.

Page 1