{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig2vd2n3zpfrx236pi4gaux4u2iq22fgn3vesmqkooifjt252oryu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pi6woz4d47bkuws673w2il2r/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnl6kad72z32"
  },
  "path": "/t/is-there-a-way-to-get-a-oschar-literal-more-conveniently-than-osp-head/14206#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-05T21:40:04.000Z",
  "site": "https://discourse.haskell.org",
  "tags": [
    "@eldritch-cookie"
  ],
  "textContent": "Yes, it’s not clear to me whether OP really wants `OsChar`, because it’s not a representation of a unicode codepoint anyway.\n\nSo `osp`/`osstr` is the right thing for that.\n\nWhat exactly are you trying to achieve @eldritch-cookie ?",
  "title": "Is there a way to get a OsChar literal more conveniently than osp + head"
}