Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

A lot of C++ changes and world incompatibility

Awkward...

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 17:42

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26

Last I checked the limit when not configured is 30,912, which is (2^15 = 32,768) minus a safety margin. You can find a lot of discussions about why we don't ("can't" isn't quite correct) have larger world sizes.

But then how did FreeMiner blow past those limits?

Statistics: Posted by ArceusI — Wed Jun 17, 2026 01:26