The case of the day is Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co. (7th Cir. 2026). I covered the case back in October, when I submitted an amicus brief on behalf of friends-of-Letters-Blogatory Bill Dodge and Maggie Gardner. In today’s case, the Seventh Circuit has now joined the Second Circuit in holding… Continue Reading Case of the Day: Kangol v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import &…

The case of the day is Whoop, Inc. v. Serinity Group (D. Mass. 2026). The case is, in a sense, routine, but I wanted to write about it because it’s a Massachusetts decision, because I like the “Whoop” company name, and because it illustrates a couple of familiar but still useful points about service by… Continue Reading Case of the day: Whoop v. Serinity Group

The post Case of the day: Whoop v.…

The case of the day is Fox Corp. v. Media Deportes Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. (S.D.N.Y. 2026). The case raises a perennial Letters Blogatory question: when the Hague Service Convention applies, can you serve a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction on a defendant in a way that you couldn’t serve the… Continue Reading Case of the day: Fox Corp. v. Media Deportes Mexico

The post…

The case of the day is Wepard Corp. v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2026). Diaz, Reus & Targ, a law firm, sued Wepard for allegedly unpaid legal fees. Wepard was located in Malta. DRT moved for leave to serve process by email, but Malta has objected to service by alternate… Continue Reading Case of the Day: Wepard Corp. v. Diaz, Reus & Targ

The post Case of the Day: Wepard Corp.…