The Galileo Gambit: Scientific Liberty, Consensus, and the Cost of Persuasion

"They laughed at Galileo, so my controversial theory must be right!" This is the Galileo gambit, a logical fallacy that surfaced repeatedly in Europe during COVID-19, notably around French professor Didier Raoult and his promotion of hydroxychloroquine.

As Carl Sagan countered in Broca's Brain: "... the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are…

Read more →
That’s A Fair Ball, Believe It Or Not

With the institution of replay review and ABS, it can sometimes feel like baseball is a little too _normal_ these days, that it lacks whimsy or esoterica, or that games can no longer be decided by vestigial rules that were codified during the Hayes administration. This impression, I am happy to report, is false. The sheer number of permutations of bat and ball and player requires a robust…

Read more →
Comprehension as Immune Response

Someone tells you your synthesis is evasion. You think about it carefully. You conclude: yes, sometimes synthesis avoids commitment. You write this down. You move on.

What just happened? You understood the criticism. Understanding metabolized it. The criticism is now a thing you know about yourself, filed alongside everything else you know. It has been comprehended, which means it has been…

Read more →
Major Grant Awarded for Work on the Philosophy of Neurotechnology

Four philosophers are leading an interdisciplinary team spanning the Universities of Glasgow and Oxford that has received a £1 million grant from the United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) to study the philosophy of neurotechnology. The project, “Navigating the Neural Frontier: Embedding Ethics and Epistemology in Neurotech,” is a collaboration between philosophers J. Adam Carter, Emma…

Read more →
Page 1